Founder-led training programme
Automating Workflows with Low-Code Solutions
Design a useful low-code automation that remains understandable, recoverable and responsibly owned after the workshop.
Turn one repetitive workflow into a tested low-code prototype and a practical support runbook, with exception handling, human checkpoints and production dependencies made explicit.
Duration: 1 Day.
Agreed after workflow discovery
Format: Public Online · Private Online · Private On-Site.
Remote build lab or in-person studio
Level: intermediate.
Tested prototype and support runbook
Overview
What this programme covers
Begin with operational reality, then decide whether automation deserves a place in the process.
A quick automation can conceal a poor process, move bad data faster or leave nobody able to recover when something fails. This programme starts by examining the work itself. Participants map a repetitive workflow from trigger to outcome, exposing decisions, handoffs, data needs and exception routes before selecting an appropriate automation boundary. They then translate that design into a bounded low-code prototype using safe or synthetic inputs. Testing covers expected behaviour and selected failures, including the points where a person must intervene. The final stage turns technical learning into operational ownership through a concise support runbook for access, monitoring, recovery and controlled change. The result is not a promise of production deployment. It is a defensible prototype and an informed decision about whether, where and under whose authority automation should proceed.
Evidence standard
Evidence and learning boundaries
Evidence comes from the process map, prototype test record and completed support runbook. Together they show whether participants can define a sensible boundary, anticipate exceptions and explain the organisational conditions required for any later deployment.
Learning outcomes
What participants will learn
Leave with practical evidence, a maintainable handover and clearer conditions for any next step.
Map a repetitive process accurately enough to reveal triggers, decisions, data movement, handoffs and exceptions.
Choose an automation boundary that preserves human judgement where risk, ambiguity or accountability demands it.
Construct a bounded low-code prototype with safe inputs and test successful, failed and interrupted routes.
Record access, permission, notification and recovery requirements without placing credentials in workshop materials.
Produce a support runbook that assigns ownership and identifies monitoring, change-control and approval dependencies.
Programme structure
Programme modules
Move from workflow diagnosis through responsible design and testing to sustainable operational ownership.
Interrogate the workflow
Participants trace one recurring process from its initiating event to its real outcome. Decisions, queues, data exchanges and exception paths are made visible. The group distinguishes genuine manual burden from delays caused by unclear authority, incomplete information or avoidable rework, so automation is applied only where it can add value. The selected opportunity is recorded with a reasoned inclusion or exclusion decision.
Set responsible boundaries
The process map becomes a low-code design of triggers, conditions, actions and human checkpoints. Participants define the minimum data and permissions required, decide which cases must leave the automated route, and record ownership questions that need an organisational answer before any live connection is considered. That boundary becomes the reference point for both testing and later governance conversations.
Build and challenge
Using safe or synthetic inputs, participants assemble a bounded prototype and observe how it behaves. Tests cover the intended path alongside missing data, duplicate records and selected service failures. Logs, notifications and recovery steps are inspected so one successful demonstration is never mistaken for operational readiness. Findings are recorded in language that process owners and technical reviewers can both interrogate.
Plan sustainable support
Each team converts its prototype findings into a readable support runbook. The document identifies access stewardship, monitoring signals, exception response, change approval and rollback considerations. A final review determines what further architecture, security, data or operational evidence would be required before production deployment. The team leaves knowing which questions remain open and who should answer them.
Audience
Who this is for
Best suited to process owners, improvement teams and sponsors who can work with a realistic workflow.
Operations, service and project teams responsible for improving a repetitive workflow across people or systems.
Process owners who need to evaluate where low-code automation is useful and where judgement must remain human.
Digital practitioners expected to prototype safely while working within existing access, security and data controls.
Managers sponsoring an automation experiment who can clarify ownership and route later production approvals appropriately.
Fit check
Pause before booking when
This workshop does not provide production credentials, security approval or authority to connect live organisational systems.
It is unsuitable when participants cannot bring a realistic process or a responsibly anonymised equivalent to examine.
Implementation, platform administration and ongoing workflow support require separate ownership beyond the facilitated learning engagement.
Delivery and pricing
Choose the route that fits the cohort
Choose a remote lab or in-person studio after the process and platform context are understood.
Delivery
Remote build lab
A live online format for distributed teams, combining process mapping, guided prototyping and screen-based test review around one agreed workflow. Breakout decisions are brought back into one shared operating picture for review.
Delivery
In-person studio
A facilitated working session for teams that benefit from mapping handoffs together and challenging an automation design in the same room. Physical working surfaces support detailed handoff analysis without turning the day into a software demonstration.
Delivery
Preparation
Discovery confirms the workflow, participants, safe test inputs, available platform and decision owners before the learning design is finalised. This ensures the exercises reflect real constraints without exposing confidential credentials or production data.
Delivery
Review handover
The closing review examines test evidence and the support runbook, then records unresolved production dependencies for the appropriate organisational owners. Nothing proceeds by implication: the next decision, accountable owner and required assurance are stated plainly.
£595
Public Online
Founder-led discovery and facilitation centred on one agreed workflow, participant group and responsible automation boundary.
£4500
Private Tutor-Led
Guided process mapping, prototype exercises, failure testing and reusable support-runbook materials within the confirmed format.
On-Demand
A written proposal confirming dates, scope, venue or online arrangements, fees and any separately priced implementation support.
Founder-led delivery
Tobi Akiode
Founder-led facilitation across process analysis, low-code design, exception testing and operational handover.
Tobi Akiode leads the workshop personally, helping participants move between operational reality and low-code design without overstating what a prototype proves. Facilitation tests assumptions about process value, exception ownership and maintainability while keeping security and production authority with the client organisation.
The engagement is scoped around a safe learning environment, a named process and clear decision owners. Live access is not required, credentials are not collected, and any production recommendation is framed as a dependency for authorised client review.
Questions
What buyers usually ask before booking
Understand the expected preparation, practical outputs, access boundaries and route to a tailored proposal.
Who is this low-code automation programme designed for?
It is designed for teams that own or improve a repetitive workflow and want to test whether low-code automation is appropriate. Participants should understand the current process, while sponsors should be able to clarify ownership and route security, data or production decisions to authorised colleagues. A mixed operational and digital cohort can be especially valuable when responsibilities are clearly defined.
What will participants create during the workshop?
Participants create a mapped workflow, a bounded prototype using safe inputs, a record of normal and selected failure tests, and a support runbook. These artefacts support an informed next-step decision; they do not constitute production approval or a promise that live deployment is suitable. Ownership and unresolved approval questions are included so the handover remains usable after delivery.
Do participants need previous low-code experience?
Prior expertise is not automatically required, but the chosen platform and participant roles are confirmed during discovery. The programme focuses on workflow reasoning, responsible boundaries and maintainability. Any platform-specific prerequisites are stated in the proposal so the practical build remains achievable and useful. Where platform familiarity is limited, the build can be scoped to protect learning quality and confidence.
Can the prototype connect to our live systems?
The learning activity is designed around safe or synthetic inputs and does not grant live-system access. A later connection would require the organisation’s own architecture, security, privacy, data and operational approvals, together with clear ownership for monitoring, incident response and controlled change. Those decisions are intentionally separated from the facilitated prototype and recorded for accountable follow-up.
How are the format, duration and fee confirmed?
A short discovery conversation establishes the process, cohort, platform, test conditions and preferred setting. The resulting proposal confirms scope, dates, facilitation format, working materials, fees and any dependencies. Additional implementation or production support is quoted separately rather than implied within training. This keeps the commercial boundary clear before dates are committed or working materials are prepared.
Ready to choose a time?
Book a focused discovery call when a conversation is the right next step.
Use this when you want to talk through an event, workshop, service or training need and agree the practical next step. Bring the challenge, desired outcome, timing and any constraints worth considering.
Choose an Event / Workshop Discovery time
This booking captures the meeting time. Use the enquiry route instead if you need to send context, files or a detailed brief first.